Search for: "Rodger Walker"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 5:42 am
Lorenn Walker, Keyria Rodgers and Mark Umbreit (Hawai'i Friends of Restorative Justice, Macon County Teen Justice Program and University of Minnesota - St. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
Two appeals are listed in the Supreme Court this week with R v F and R v M being heard by Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown on Monday 6 December. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
It will be heard on Monday 7 and Tuesday 8 February 2011 by Lords Phillips, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
The Supreme Court will for the second time this year review the lawfulness of state action in the context of immigration detention in an appeal before a nine judge bench (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Walker, Baroness Hale, Lords Brown, Collins and Kerr, Sir John Dyson SCJ) beginning on Monday 15 November and listed for four [...] [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:04 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:04 am
The hearing commenced on Wednesday 8 December before Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:07 am
Christopher Sargeant, Two Steps Backward and One Step Forward: The Cautionary Tale of Bank Mellat (No 1) Lord Walker, How Far Should Judges Develop the Common Law? [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:18 am
Just in time for tonight's big game:After this morning's discussion of the gendered violence of Debbie Wasserman Schulz's statement that Scott Walker grabbing women's hair and pulling, I was taken slightly aback by the "Doesn't this hurt? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Following Lord Rodger’s death, and in advance of Lord Brown’s retirement next year, the Supreme Court has recently announced an appointments process for two new Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
"What we're asking them to do is to make sure that the grantees provide equal services to women and men," said Kathy Rodgers, president of Legal Momentum. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm
In John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock [2018] UKUT 249 (LC), Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal, made an interesting, tricky, but important distinction concerning the criteria for when a park provides security for a mobile home. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
Lord Rodger (with whom Lords Walker and Collins and Sir John Dyson SCJ expressly agreed), at para [82] and Lord Hope, at para [35], provided detailed guidance in respect of the test to be applied by the lower tribunals and courts in determining claims for asylum protection based on sexual orientation. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:40 am
Aaron Rodgers did a great job (29) and the Colts DST was a major contributor (21). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
